Peer Reviewer Process
JK3N (Jurnal K3 Nusantara) applies a peer-review process to ensure the quality, originality, relevance, and scientific contribution of every published article.
- Initial Screening
Each submitted manuscript is initially screened by the editor to ensure that it fits the journal's focus and scope and complies with the journal's submission requirements. - Plagiarism Check
Manuscripts may be screened using plagiarism detection software to assess the originality of the submitted work. - Reviewer Assignment
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to at least two reviewers with relevant expertise in the subject area of the manuscript. - Review Process
Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on scientific quality, methodology, clarity of presentation, originality, relevance, and contribution to the field of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH). - Editorial Decision
Based on the reviewers' recommendations, the editor may decide to:- Accept without revision
- Accept with minor revisions
- Request major revisions
- Reject
- Author Revision
Authors are required to respond to reviewers' comments and revise their manuscripts within the timeframe specified by the editor. - Final Decision
After the revision process, the editor makes the final decision regarding acceptance and publication of the manuscript.
JK3N is committed to conducting the review process in an objective, transparent, fair, and confidential manner while protecting the confidentiality of manuscripts and reviewer identities.